Friday, February 2, 2018
Tuesday, April 11, 2017
Tuesday, May 3, 2016
As the (Globalized) World Turns
When I was growing up I watched soap operas with my mother,
grandmother, and aunt. This was especially true during the summer months when
my sister and I were out of school. Sometimes my grandmother and aunt would
come to visit for the afternoon and we would watch "the stories” (as my
grandmother referred to them) together. But even if we couldn’t watch them
together, we would always discuss them when we saw each other. This gave us a
way to talk about a variety of social issues as they were portrayed on the
shows.
My favorite program was As
the World Turns. At the time, there were not many strong female characters
on prime-time TV. But soap operas were ahead of the times. They had more female
characters and were able to depict more of a variety of personalities. I admired one character in particular on As the World Turns. Even then, I thought
she had very good communications skills. She was a strong woman and I liked how
she handled various situations. I decided that was how I wanted to be. Even today, I think back on that character
has being a big help to me in defining what kind of woman I wanted to become.
Later, in high school, I did a report on the history of the
radio. It was then that I learned that most American soap operas had come into
being during the heyday of radio. Years later, when television came on the
scene, they transitioned to that medium. I was reminded of all these memories
when I read the above article.
In class, we have talked about global public relations and
the challenges of getting a message across in an area that does not have the
media capabilities that we are used to here in the United States. The article
illustrates exactly what we discussed, that sometimes, plays or stories are the
best way to reach an audience.
According to the World Health Organization, depression is a
big problem among adolescents around the world. They estimate that half of
mental disorders begin by age 14, but usually go undiagnosed. In order to address this global problem, several
non-profit organizations have put together a program that broadcasts 5-7 minute
dramas on the radio. These soap operas are aimed at teens. In the one mentioned
in the article, the main character is 16 and dealing with issues like teen pregnancy
and depression.
In areas of East Africa, like Malawi and Tanzania, radio is
the only means by which they can connect to the outside world. Little is known
about depression in these small villages and this is a way to educate young
people. The teens who listen to the dramas are then encouraged to ask questions
after the broadcast. Sometimes they can text the radio station. Other times,
these programs will be listened to as a group in a community center and a facilitator
from the program will lead the discussion.
A project manager in Tanzania said, “Many of them [the
teens] have said they didn't realize that it was okay to talk about the
thoughts in their heads, and they hadn't realized that anything could be done
about the pain.”
Soap operas as a genre often get little respect, but I have
always felt that they really do serve an important purpose. This article confirms
that. It is good to know that this art form can help young people around the
world.
Tuesday, April 26, 2016
Not Just For Geeks and Nerds Anymore
The above article talks about how Dr. Who, a British Sci-fi/Fantasy show is becoming more and more
popular here in the U.S. I first
realized this about two years ago when I attended a large multi-media
convention in Atlanta. It was the weekend of the Dr. Who U.S. Season Premiere and there was a much anticipated new Doctor
character being introduced for the first time. Representatives of BBC America attended the convention
and held a pre-screening of the episode for convention attendees. My friend wanted
to go to the screening and I went with her. I was stunned when the line for the
event was wrapped around the block several times! As I sat in that huge hotel
ballroom with people from all over the country, watching a British TV show, I was struck by what a global world it really is!
I love to talk about fandoms, because one fandom in
particular has had an incredibly positive impact on my life. That is the 1980’s
TV show Beauty & the Beast. When
I first got involved in this fandom, Fandom Studies itself was only in its
infancy. Over the last 20 years, Fandom
Studies has become an acceptable area of communication research. This has been such a wonderful discovery for
me!
It all began with the publication of the book, Textual Poachers: Television fans and
participatory culture, by Henry Jenkins.
It was published in 1992 just as Beauty
&t he Beast was being canceled with a major uproar from the fans - who
were angry at not only CBS executives, but also at each other. Jenkins devoted
a whole chapter in his book to the Beauty
& the Beast situation and some of his insights are very enlightening,
even all these years later.
In the article that I did my case facilitation on, Plant,
Reysen, Roberts and Gerbasi (2014) take a very positive view of fandoms and
show how they can be a force for
Globalization and prosocial values.
I see this in my own life. Being from a very traditional
Italian-American family, I had a very narrow view of the world growing up. This view might have continued into adulthood
if not for me falling in love with Beauty
& the Beast. Slowly, through attending Beauty & the Beast conventions, I was able to meet and become
friends with a wide variety of people. These conventions are mostly held in the U.S.,
but people from all over the world attend them. I have what I consider to be
very good friends who live in Italy, France, and Australia. Not to mention acquaintances
from many more countries.
When the terror attacks in Paris happened months ago, my
first thought was about the fans that I know in France, one of whom lives near
Paris. Years ago, I might have heard
about something like the Paris attacks and thought it just a news story, a horrible
one for sure, but still one that was very far away from me.
The values of Beauty
and the Beast are about seeing beneath the surface of a person and respecting
them for who they are, not what they look like, or how much money they have.
The world of the Tunnels beneath New York City (where the Beast lives with a
group of societal outcasts) was presented as the utopian society that we would
all like to see in our world. Beauty & the Beast fans try to uphold these
values as much as we can. Like the Furry Fandom mentioned in the article, we
also raise money for charity at our yearly convention. We are a small group
too, but we often raise thousands of dollars for a charity that we select each year
based on how it relates to the shows values. For me, I think the give and take of values associated
with the show is definitely bidirectional. That is, I think I always had some
of these latent values in me, but being around people who also have them has
definitely helped to shape those values even more and given me an outlet to put
them into action.
One thing I love about the Plant, et al study is that they see a practical use for the link between
fandoms and prosocial values. They say there
might be the potential to find alternate ways to correct or prevent negative,
anti-social behavior. This would surely be a major breakthrough. Personally, I would
love for more people to experience the transformative power that fandoms have
had on me, and I hope that fandoms will prove to have an even greater positive impact
globally in the future.
Plante, C. N., Reysen, S., Roberts, S. E., Gerbasi, K. C.
(2014). “One of Us”: Engagement with
fandoms and global citizenship
identification. Psychology of Popular
Media Culture. 3/1, 49-64.
Saturday, November 2, 2013
Captain Picard Would NEVER Believe This
http://mashable.com/2013/10/31/neurocam/
This article caught my attention as being not just advanced - but BEYOND. I love to see technology that brings to mind something I saw on Star Trek years ago. But this seems beyond anything they would ever show on Sci-fi TV - unless it was Sci-fi/horror.
Neurocam and it's accompanying app was demonstrated at the Human Sensing 2013 conference in Japan recently. It is a whole system in which a headband holds an iPhone next to the wearer’s temple. The phone has a special prism so that the camera can record things from the wearer’s point of view. There are EEG sensors that will scan the brain for spikes in interest on a scale of 0-100. If the wearer's interest level goes above 60 - the device will begin recording and store each recorded file in a journal format so the wearer can remember the things that interested him or her.
As it says in the article, advertisers would love to get their hands on that info - and as such - a large advertising company is teaming up with the company that has created this prototype.
I don't seem to mind so much the personalized ads that we have talked about in class. If Facebook or other websites can show me something that I really like, as opposed to an ad that I find annoying - well - that hasn't upset me as much as some others have expressed.
But the idea of something like this being the future of advertising really does concern me. They say it will capture a "life log" and maybe be used for purposes other than direct advertising - but it still makes me very uneasy to have anything "reading my mind."
And then of course there is the danger - as there is evidence that cell phones are linked to brain tumors. So a question seems to be: will technology just ignore serious health concerns?!? As we have discussed in class - where are the limits to what we will accept?
This article caught my attention as being not just advanced - but BEYOND. I love to see technology that brings to mind something I saw on Star Trek years ago. But this seems beyond anything they would ever show on Sci-fi TV - unless it was Sci-fi/horror.
Neurocam and it's accompanying app was demonstrated at the Human Sensing 2013 conference in Japan recently. It is a whole system in which a headband holds an iPhone next to the wearer’s temple. The phone has a special prism so that the camera can record things from the wearer’s point of view. There are EEG sensors that will scan the brain for spikes in interest on a scale of 0-100. If the wearer's interest level goes above 60 - the device will begin recording and store each recorded file in a journal format so the wearer can remember the things that interested him or her.
As it says in the article, advertisers would love to get their hands on that info - and as such - a large advertising company is teaming up with the company that has created this prototype.
I don't seem to mind so much the personalized ads that we have talked about in class. If Facebook or other websites can show me something that I really like, as opposed to an ad that I find annoying - well - that hasn't upset me as much as some others have expressed.
But the idea of something like this being the future of advertising really does concern me. They say it will capture a "life log" and maybe be used for purposes other than direct advertising - but it still makes me very uneasy to have anything "reading my mind."
And then of course there is the danger - as there is evidence that cell phones are linked to brain tumors. So a question seems to be: will technology just ignore serious health concerns?!? As we have discussed in class - where are the limits to what we will accept?
Saturday, October 19, 2013
Everyone (not just Techies) Should Read Fiction!
http://mashable.com/2013/10/18/tech-fiction-reading/
I found this article on Mashable that really intrigued me. In class we talked about Technological Determinism, and at the time, I tended to agree that technology does control our lives a lot of the time. If someone doesn't have a cell phone or is not on Social Media often times they are seen as being hopelessly outdated. There are times when one feels compelled to learn this program or that program because everyone else knows it. Once, I was let go from a temp job because I didn't know Excel well enough for my superior. I knew the basics, and was more than willing to learn, but that wasn't good enough for her.
However, this article brings up a good point. It says that in 2007 China allowed it's first ever government approved Science Fiction & Fantasy convention. Why did they suddenly do this when Science Fiction & Fantasy had be disapproved of for so long? Because they realized that the Chinese where brilliant at putting existing things together, but had no imagination to create new things. When they interviewed American innovators at Google, Apple and Microsoft, they found that all of them had enjoyed science fiction as children.
I am a lover of Science Fiction & Fantasy myself - I've even attended many Sci-Fi/Fantasy conventions. Sometimes I get laughed at for doing this by people who don't "get" it - but I have always appreciated the creative potential of it most of all. I came from a family who did not encourage creativity - in essence they were a lot like the Chinese government - didn't see the point of it. As I got older, I discovered Sci-Fi & Fantasy and found that it's an amazing feeling to attend one of these conventions and be surrounded by so many creative-minded people. I believe that, my own creativity was nurtured by my love of Sci-Fi & Fantasy in a way that it never would have been otherwise. I'm also a book lover in general and I think this idea can also apply to fiction of all kinds if you don't like Sci-Fi/Fantasy. After a day at work or reading articles for class - I usually feel the need to relax with a good fiction book.
I can't believe that I didn't see this side of the argument until now, but maybe it's because many people don't approve of those of us who go to Sci-Fi/Fantasy conventions - so I've learned to keep the "business" and "fun" sides of me somewhat separate. Whatever the reason, this article has changed my view on the Technological/Media Determinism debate.
I found this article on Mashable that really intrigued me. In class we talked about Technological Determinism, and at the time, I tended to agree that technology does control our lives a lot of the time. If someone doesn't have a cell phone or is not on Social Media often times they are seen as being hopelessly outdated. There are times when one feels compelled to learn this program or that program because everyone else knows it. Once, I was let go from a temp job because I didn't know Excel well enough for my superior. I knew the basics, and was more than willing to learn, but that wasn't good enough for her.
However, this article brings up a good point. It says that in 2007 China allowed it's first ever government approved Science Fiction & Fantasy convention. Why did they suddenly do this when Science Fiction & Fantasy had be disapproved of for so long? Because they realized that the Chinese where brilliant at putting existing things together, but had no imagination to create new things. When they interviewed American innovators at Google, Apple and Microsoft, they found that all of them had enjoyed science fiction as children.
I am a lover of Science Fiction & Fantasy myself - I've even attended many Sci-Fi/Fantasy conventions. Sometimes I get laughed at for doing this by people who don't "get" it - but I have always appreciated the creative potential of it most of all. I came from a family who did not encourage creativity - in essence they were a lot like the Chinese government - didn't see the point of it. As I got older, I discovered Sci-Fi & Fantasy and found that it's an amazing feeling to attend one of these conventions and be surrounded by so many creative-minded people. I believe that, my own creativity was nurtured by my love of Sci-Fi & Fantasy in a way that it never would have been otherwise. I'm also a book lover in general and I think this idea can also apply to fiction of all kinds if you don't like Sci-Fi/Fantasy. After a day at work or reading articles for class - I usually feel the need to relax with a good fiction book.
I can't believe that I didn't see this side of the argument until now, but maybe it's because many people don't approve of those of us who go to Sci-Fi/Fantasy conventions - so I've learned to keep the "business" and "fun" sides of me somewhat separate. Whatever the reason, this article has changed my view on the Technological/Media Determinism debate.
Sunday, October 6, 2013
"Fall"-ing in Love with TV
http://gigaom.com/2013/10/05/best-apps-to-track-tv-show-episodes/
I was very interested to read this article about how there are many apps out there now that help you manage your TV viewing. Recently, I heard a conversation on the morning radio about how TV is better than it's ever been - even better than the movies that are out there. While I like some movies, I have always liked TV better because you can follow favorite characters for a longer period of time. So I am really happy about this trend!
Television programing used to be seen as trivial compared to film. This shift, though, is at least in part due to technology. DVRs make it much easier to record multiple programs. It is also much easier to keep track of what you still have to watch. This was not possible with the VCR. You can also get episodes on-line or on services like Netflixs. And, worst comes to worst, you can buy the DVDs. Many people, these days, do not even start watching a series until it is over. That may have been possible years ago, but only if you could find the reruns somewhere - usually at an odd time or on an odd channel.
Technology has truly changed the way we watch TV. As a result, maybe networks are taking more time to have better quality programs. Or maybe people are taking more time to find the good programs that were always around. At any rate, technology then responds to the new trend with apps that further help us to organize our viewing. As the article says, gone are the days of the TV section "black & white grid" in the newspaper.
I think this is a good example that relates to the "Technological or Media Determinism" that I just read about in our article for Monday's class.
I was very interested to read this article about how there are many apps out there now that help you manage your TV viewing. Recently, I heard a conversation on the morning radio about how TV is better than it's ever been - even better than the movies that are out there. While I like some movies, I have always liked TV better because you can follow favorite characters for a longer period of time. So I am really happy about this trend!
Television programing used to be seen as trivial compared to film. This shift, though, is at least in part due to technology. DVRs make it much easier to record multiple programs. It is also much easier to keep track of what you still have to watch. This was not possible with the VCR. You can also get episodes on-line or on services like Netflixs. And, worst comes to worst, you can buy the DVDs. Many people, these days, do not even start watching a series until it is over. That may have been possible years ago, but only if you could find the reruns somewhere - usually at an odd time or on an odd channel.
Technology has truly changed the way we watch TV. As a result, maybe networks are taking more time to have better quality programs. Or maybe people are taking more time to find the good programs that were always around. At any rate, technology then responds to the new trend with apps that further help us to organize our viewing. As the article says, gone are the days of the TV section "black & white grid" in the newspaper.
I think this is a good example that relates to the "Technological or Media Determinism" that I just read about in our article for Monday's class.
Friday, September 27, 2013
Between a Rock and a Hard Place
http://gigaom.com/2013/09/24/as-goodreads-grows-up-it-cant-please-everyone-should-it-try/?go_commented=1#comment-1368990
This article concerns Goodreads, a site that I often describe to people as "Facebook for book lovers." I first heard of this site through a friend who was also in the book publishing field. I found that it really filled a need. After reading a good book, I often have the desire to discuss it with someone. But that is harder than it sounds because most of the time, my friends and I do not have the same tastes in books. I have gotten into the habit of posting a review of most books I read a few days after finishing them.
One day, after posting a review, I received a "Friend" request from the author of the book I reviewed! I was shocked because I didn't realize that authors were also on this site. I felt honored to receive such a request from her because I loved her story, and I took that opportunity to send her a message and tell her privately.
My experience was good, yet I see how this can cause a problem. As Goodreads grows in popularity, two communities are forming: readers and authors. It would seem like these two groups have a lot in common, but in reality, maybe they can also be at odds with each other.
I often see extremely negative reviews on Goodreads. It seems like some people are just out to be mean. If I was an author, I don't know if I would want to be on Goodreads. Yes, as an author, one must be able to accept criticism, but some people, I believe, are guilty of the the on-line version of "road rage." I think as an author this could have very negative effects on career, creativity, etc.
Goodreads, according to the article, is taking steps to minimize these issues by deleting certain content. Users are now afraid that what they post is not going to be safe from being randomly deleted.
We have discussed in class how various social network sites have come and gone over they years due to some of these same issues. The downfall of MySpace was due to opposing communities and Friendster faced losing the trust of its users.
Hopefully, Goodreads can learn from others mistakes and come out on top of this situation.
This article concerns Goodreads, a site that I often describe to people as "Facebook for book lovers." I first heard of this site through a friend who was also in the book publishing field. I found that it really filled a need. After reading a good book, I often have the desire to discuss it with someone. But that is harder than it sounds because most of the time, my friends and I do not have the same tastes in books. I have gotten into the habit of posting a review of most books I read a few days after finishing them.
One day, after posting a review, I received a "Friend" request from the author of the book I reviewed! I was shocked because I didn't realize that authors were also on this site. I felt honored to receive such a request from her because I loved her story, and I took that opportunity to send her a message and tell her privately.
My experience was good, yet I see how this can cause a problem. As Goodreads grows in popularity, two communities are forming: readers and authors. It would seem like these two groups have a lot in common, but in reality, maybe they can also be at odds with each other.
I often see extremely negative reviews on Goodreads. It seems like some people are just out to be mean. If I was an author, I don't know if I would want to be on Goodreads. Yes, as an author, one must be able to accept criticism, but some people, I believe, are guilty of the the on-line version of "road rage." I think as an author this could have very negative effects on career, creativity, etc.
Goodreads, according to the article, is taking steps to minimize these issues by deleting certain content. Users are now afraid that what they post is not going to be safe from being randomly deleted.
We have discussed in class how various social network sites have come and gone over they years due to some of these same issues. The downfall of MySpace was due to opposing communities and Friendster faced losing the trust of its users.
Hopefully, Goodreads can learn from others mistakes and come out on top of this situation.
Monday, December 31, 2012
Beastly is in the Eye of the Beholder - Part V
Finally, just in case you’re thinking that Beauty & the Beast stories always
have to be supernatural in nature, there is one more couple that bears mention
on this topic. Far from the genres of Science
Fiction or Paranormal Romance, is the Daytime Drama. John and Evangeline were
characters on the drama “One Life to Live.”
Working with much more realistic situations, these writers were still able
to create a story line that quite stunningly mirrored Vincent and Catherine.
When “One Life to Live” ended earlier this year, John did have his happy ending…with Natalie. She was a good match for him, and there was even some chemistry, but she was most certainly not a Beauty to his Beast. John and Natalie were much too similar to fit this category. They were from the same “world” – a tough neighborhood in Atlantic City, NJ. They met playing pool in a bar – an activity that it doesn’t seem likely Evangeline or Catherine would ever be found doing. The point is that not every good couple, nor every popular romance, fits this category. I’m not seeing Vincent and Catherine in every couple out there, only a select few, but they have been popping up with some consistency over the years.
John is our very human Beast. He stands out sharply in a town of well
dressed people who some would say talk way too much about their feelings. John, who wears only black, is a man of very few
words. He has Vincent’s striking and
soulful blue eyes and a quiet, raspy voice. He is the dark and brooding
resident of Llanview. But John is not your
typical “Bad Boy” character which abounds in Daytime and elsewhere. He has never made a conscious choice to be
involved with bad things. He’s not a
reformed criminal. He is, in fact, a
former FBI agent and a dedicated cop.
What makes him Beastly is, like Vincent, largely out of his
control.
Events in John’s past contribute to his Beastly
behavior. First, his dad, also a cop,
was killed in the line of duty when John was just 10 years old. He was then forced to assume the role of man-of-the-house
for his younger brother and mother. This
engendered a very serious attitude and an exaggerated sense of responsibility
in him at a young age. His father’s murder case was never solved and it haunts him.
Whenever something goes wrong, John is usually ready to take the blame for it. He
is at least has hard on himself as Vincent would be for things that he has
little or no control over. He sees his
job, at least in part, as “Protector” and will race to the rescue of anyone he
feels is in his charge.
In addition to all this, once, while he worked
diligently on a serial killer case, his fiancé was captured and became the
killer’s next victim. He felt responsible for her death happening on
his watch. As a result, John is
seriously handicapped in his ability to have a normal loving relationship. But his unspoken feelings for his Beauty,
like Vincent’s, were always quite obvious to anyone who was paying attention.
Evangeline was the Beauty. She was a very classy attorney who even had
some associations with the DA’s office.
She oozed a refined “Park Avenue” style in just about everything she
said and did, and especially in what she wore.
Her apartment was done in delicate pastels. (John lived in a cheap motel
in a bad part of town.) Even her hair
was worn straight and smooth in a Catherine-like cut and she, of course, was
very beautiful.
She loved John and she suspected that he felt the
same way, but his lack of ability to express it upset her. Evangeline was very idealistic, with a strong
sense of right and wrong and she argued very convincingly – much as Catherine would
– using her lawyer’s training. Eventually,
she broke up with him, emphasizing the fact that in healthy relationships there
should be communication, and if she was the right one for him, he should be
able to tell her he loved her.
At
the time, this was intended to be a plot device to keep them apart a little
longer. But unfortunately, Daytime
politics got in the way. The actress
left the show while John and Evangeline were apart. The-Powers-That-Be didn’t feel that they
could replace her because she had been extremely popular. So Evangeline was eventually killed off in a
very horrible and senseless way. It was
more than a little déjà
vu, to be sure! When “One Life to Live” ended earlier this year, John did have his happy ending…with Natalie. She was a good match for him, and there was even some chemistry, but she was most certainly not a Beauty to his Beast. John and Natalie were much too similar to fit this category. They were from the same “world” – a tough neighborhood in Atlantic City, NJ. They met playing pool in a bar – an activity that it doesn’t seem likely Evangeline or Catherine would ever be found doing. The point is that not every good couple, nor every popular romance, fits this category. I’m not seeing Vincent and Catherine in every couple out there, only a select few, but they have been popping up with some consistency over the years.
As we all know, it was never meant for Clark and
Lana to be together forever. It remains
to be seen what will ultimately happen between Stefan and Elena. Max and Liz were the only Beauty & the Beast couple to actually be granted their happy
ending. But, I think it’s important to note, that in all these cases, you get
the intense romance of a Beauty & the
Beast story minus the accusations of impropriety when the two do, in fact,
get together. All of these relationships
were consummated, whether they worked out or not.
While we love Vincent exactly as he is and know in
our hearts that there could never be a more perfect Beast, Hollywood is probably
congratulating themselves on finding a solution to a sticky TV problem – how to
bring the Beauty and the Beast together - and stay on the air.
One last thought: Having a normal - or even far
above normal - looking Beast may seem like a cheapening of the Beauty & the Beast story in some
ways. But, with the help of good writing
– something that all these shows had - it really can take the symbolism to a
new level.
In life, it’s easy to assume the other person has it
all together. We especially think this
of extremely good looking people. But
the truth is we all have our Beastly side – the side that we wish we could just
ignore or run away from. I have always
found it quite amusing to imagine what Vincent would say if he knew that some
of the very best looking guys there are could experience so much of the very same
obstacles and insecurities that he has gone through with Catherine!
There are probably more examples that could be
discussed. These have just stood out to
me as being too much of a coincidence to be believed. Vincent and Catherine’s influence was far
reaching, indeed. They can never, of
course, be truly duplicated, not even by a so-called “reboot.” But…if imitation truly is the sincerest form
of flattery, then we Vincent and Catherine fans should be delighted with all
these new versions of the story being planned.
They might explore the “tale as old as time” in new and modern ways, but
we will always know in our hearts that all over Television Land, our Vincent
and Catherine live on through them…again and again and again.
A reference used for this essay
and a very good book for anyone who wants to read more is: “The Meanings of ‘Beauty & the Beast’: A
Handbook” by Jerry Griswold, Broadview Press, 2004.
Saturday, December 29, 2012
Beastly is in the Eye of the Beholder - Part IV
While “Roswell” and “Smallville” fit neatly into the
genre of Science Fiction, that category has always seemed too limiting for
Vincent and Catherine. Our story is a
romance with supernatural and/or fantasy elements. In more recent years, the Vampire Romance as
been wildly popular. When examined more
closely, this “new” kind of paranormal romance is really just a slightly darker
twist on the Beauty & the Beast
theme. The vampires at least started out
as humans. But, what could be more
Beastly than a boyfriend who must drink blood to survive? There is always the threat that he might lose
control over himself and drink his love’s blood as well - much the same way
Vincent feared losing control and hurting Catherine. The Beauty & the Beast elements we love are almost always present
in these stories – it’s simply an adjustment in the symbolism.
In The Vampire
Diaries, there are many Beauty &
the Beast nuances. Stefan comes into
Elena’s life at a very difficult time, when she is grieving the death of her
parents. For Elena, this is the
life-altering event that parallels Catherine’s attack. It is later revealed that Stefan actually
witnessed the crash that killed her parents.
He pulled over and rescued Elena from the car that was quickly becoming
submerged in a lake and then vanished back to his solitary life. She had no memory of the event and he had no
intention of ever seeing her again. But
he then returns to Mystic Falls, in the same way Vincent returned to
Catherine’s balcony eight months later, because, as he puts it, he “had to know
her.”
As the title of this show would suggest, Elena keeps
a diary. At one point she misplaced it
and Stefan found it and returned it to her.
He assured her that he didn’t read it.
When she asked why he didn’t take advantage of the obvious opportunity
he responded, “I wouldn’t want anyone reading mine.” The sensitive Stefan, like Vincent, also
keeps a journal.
Towards the end of the first season, the show even
managed to produce a very good recreation of The Trilogy. Stefan does not normally drink human blood
because he is against killing humans.
However, this makes him weaker than most vampires. At one point, he was forced to drink a lot of
human blood and it had the effect of bringing on an illness or “madness” very
similar to what Vincent went through.
Stefan was slowing losing control of his more Beastly urges and we saw a
side of him that, up until now, we would not have believed existed. Not wanting to alarm Elena, he pretended for
a time that all was well – but it was clear that he was coming unraveled. When she confronts him about it, he snaps at
her and tries to drive her away with a Beastly growl. Then, in the next instant, he realizes how he
has frightened her and collapses in her arms sobbing and apologizing
profusely. Through it all, Elena stands
firm in her love for him and belief that he won’t hurt her.
It is interesting to also consider the Beauties in
these stories. Elena and Lana begin their
respective series being the most popular girl in school. They were most certainly the high school equivalent
of Catherine’s Upper East Side socialite persona. Lana and Elena were even both cheerleaders. Lana
was dating the star of the football team. But they both make changes – such as quitting
the cheerleading squad - after meeting Clark and Stefan. They see the shallowness of their activities
for the first time and decide they want to devote themselves to more meaningful
things. Lana became restless with her quarterback
boyfriend and he was written out of the show in the first season. But my feeling was that she would have stopped
dating him eventually, for the same basic reasons Catherine ended things with Tom.
The female leads in these shows, Liz, Lana and Elena,
play the role of the Beauty well by being unbelievably dedicated and
understanding, as Catherine was, and loving him in spite of his differences –
whatever they might be. The Beauty’s job
is to love the Beast in spite of the fact that he might not love or accept
himself. In a larger sense, it is what
holds us back from love that makes us “Beastly,” that could be many things. Likewise, it’s what gently brings us toward
love that makes us “Beauty-full.”
Liz and Lana were more Catherine-like in that they held
back and didn’t always say in so many words what they were surely thinking in
some of the more obvious displays of Beastliness. Elena, on the other hand, is
a bit more outspoken. She puts herself
in danger quite often and when questioned about it has declared, “If anyone is
going to die in this [situation] it’s going to be me.” It was very hard not to
think of Catherine at that moment and how she is often put down for being
“careless” when I believe this was always much closer to her true motivation. That’s just how Beauties are – unselfish to a
fault. They would much rather put
themselves in danger than have the people they love hurt because of them. Didn’t the original Beauty of the fairytale volunteer to take her father’s place
without giving any thought to herself or the danger that might be involved?
Another interesting parallel between our show and
these others is the question of how to deal with The Secret. It was very
clearly understood, and never challenged, that Catherine could not tell anyone
about Vincent and the Tunnels. Poor
Catherine was very much alone with The Secret.
Liz tried to keep the secret with all good
intentions, but her best friend, Maria, soon knew that something was wrong and
coaxed it out of her, as any best friend would.
Maria was a bubbly Jenny-like personality that contrasted sharply with Liz’s
more elegant Catherine personality.
Maria wound up being drawn into the alien drama and even dated the other
alien, Michael.
Once again, Elena was a bit bolder on this issue as
well. She made a conscious decision to
tell her best friend in the first couple of episodes! Then she went straight to Stefan and told him
that she had shared his secret with Bonnie.
In response to his look of surprise she said, “I can’t do this
alone.” To which he relented, “You
shouldn’t have to.” It’s difficult to
not feel Catherine’s influence on these two.
(continued...)
Friday, December 14, 2012
Beastly is in the Eye of the Beholder - Part III
The first program that I remember seeing this in was
“Roswell.” It’s the story of the small
town in New Mexico where aliens are believed to have crash-landed. In the series, the aliens take the form of
three teenagers, a girl and two boys, who are living with adoptive
parents. They believe they must keep
their alien identities hidden, even from their parents, or face being “hunted”
and/or “studied” in laboratories.
Liz is the girl next door who works at the local
café. One day, Max and his friends are
eating in the café. While they are there,
the café is held up and Liz is shot. In
the confusion that follows, the three aliens would normally just slip
away. They are used to keeping a very
low profile in town, not wanting to draw any unnecessary attention to their
lives. But Max can’t leave; he has admired Liz from afar for a long time and
cannot let her die. Going against
everything his instincts for survival, and the other two, are telling him he
uses his alien power to save Liz’s life.
His healing leaves a hand print on her body and so there are lots of
questions afterward. Eventually, Max
tells Liz the whole truth and asks her to keep his secret.
The main mistake that this show made was having it
be all about the teens. The parents (one
of whom was played by Jo Anderson) were 100% clueless to all that was going on
right under their noses, and this got annoying very fast.
Right around the time this show ended, “Smallville” premiered
and improved on the concepts that “Roswell” had started. “Smallville” corrected the
adults-are-all-stupid flaw in the “Roswell” premise. Clark’s parents were fully
aware of their unusual child. Jonathan
and Martha Kent were the most intelligent and supportive parents you ever
wanted to meet, and this went a long way toward giving the show appeal to a
much wider adult audience.
The main underlying theme that both these shows
shared was the idea of an alien in the role of the Beast. Both Max and Clark were secretly in love with
the most beautiful girl in town. But
they knew they were Different. They both
had a big secret. Max felt that his
secret was a burden for Liz to share.
Clark feared telling Lana the truth for the same reason. Clark believed he too would be rejected by
everyone he loved if they knew the truth about him. There was also a lot of guilt. Clark knew that Lana’s parents had been killed
in the meteor shower that brought him to earth.
In essence, he blamed himself for her pain. In addition, both Max and Clark knew nothing
about their planet of origin and that made them doubt themselves even
further. In each case, they reacted much
like Vincent would to the progression of a romantic relationship.
Of these two shows, granted, “Smallville” had a lot
of themes going on, and especially when Lois came along, lost the Beauty & the Beast flavor. “Roswell” was much more focused on the
romance overall. In what may have been
one of the best TV theme songs ever, the singer Dido echoed Vincent’s words in “Nor
Iron Bars a Cage” in haunting beautiful tones:
I am what I am…
I’ll do what I want, but I can’t
hide.
I won’t go, I won’t sleep, I can’t
breathe,
Until you’re resting here with me.
I won’t leave, I can’t hide, I
cannot be,
Until you’re resting here with me.
(continued...)
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Beastly is in the Eye of the Beholder - Part II
Versions of this story, which scholars like to
categorize as “Animal Husband” stories, exist in all cultures and time periods
throughout history. As most of us know
by now, the first written form is generally thought to be the Greek Myth of Cupid & Psyche.
But the version we would recognize as Beauty & the Beast was first
published in France in 1740 by a woman named Gabrielle de Villeneuve. She was a frequenter of the Paris salons
where the telling of “Fairy Stories” was a popular form of entertainment. Her version was long, complex and clearly
geared toward an adult, aristocratic audience.
About twelve years later, another French woman named
Madame Le Prince de Beaumont took that version and shortened and simplified it,
with the idea of a children’s audience in mind.
In doing so, she helped to create the new concept of Children’s
Literature, which really had not existed prior to that time. So, contrary to what the library staff was
thinking back in 1987, Beauty & the
Beast started out as a story for adults.
What makes this story so attractive and versatile is
its symbolism. Beauty & the Beast asks big, timeless questions like: What is Beauty? And, maybe more
importantly: What is Beastly? These are questions that could be debated
endlessly, and can be changed and adapted quite easily, as Madame Beaumont did,
to just about any audience.
This idea was brought home to me in 2006, while
doing research for a Beauty & the
Beast themed English paper. I came
across a critique of Jean Cocteau’s 1946 French movie version “La Belle et la Bête.”
It spoke about how there is more to the Beast than just his physical
appearance. He has little of the social
refinement that would have been expected of someone in his class and time
period. This Beastly lack of social
graces is lost on contemporary audiences.
Another example is Disney’s Beast. When you think about it, he basically behaves
like a naughty child. This is evident in
how he is repeatedly told he must learn to “control his temper.” There is also the sweet scene in which Belle tries
to teach him how to have more acceptable table manners.
In contrast to Cocteau and Disney, our Vincent
certainly does not need to learn better manners. Yet, he is still the Beast of
the story. The definition of Beast here
is much more a comment on our society than on Vincent himself. After all, we claim to value the princely
traits Vincent possesses on the inside – but most people miss them – because of
how he looks on the outside.
It is true that in all of these versions the Beast does
look the part – other than human.
Vincent conforms to how a Beast should look, but not how he should
act. Vincent is also the first Beast to
remain as he is and not turn into someone more human looking. This is due, as least in part, to the medium
that gave birth to Vincent - television.
A book or a movie simply ends at a given time. You
can hint at the “happily ever after” but you don’t necessarily have to see
it. In television, the end is much harder
to pinpoint. You have to plan for a next
week and a next season. As a result, Vincent
and Catherine were the first Beauty and Beast that we really got to know in an
on-going and personal way. The more we knew them, the more we loved them – and
the more we wanted them to have their version of the traditional “happily ever
after” ending.
These factors created a unique situation in Beauty & the Beast history. Ron Koslow didn’t intend a “happily ever
after” ending. He didn’t even think it
was possible. Those in charge completely
underestimated the power of this story – the very power of love itself! When they realized what had happened it was
almost too late to “fix” it. Censors
would surely pass judgment on Vincent and Catherine having their happily ever
after. Many misguided souls would call
it “bestiality.” There was no easy
solution to this dilemma. But there was
no denying the appeal of the story.
So with Vincent having been the first Beast to step
outside the box of expectations, it makes sense that future attempts would have
a Beast that doesn’t even look the part at all. In order to have their cake and
eat it too, television writers found other ways to create the Beast.
(continued...)
Monday, December 10, 2012
Beastly is in the Eye of the Beholder - Part I
This essay began as
a speech that I wrote and presented at a Toastmasters Club meeting in
2010. With the news of the new CW series (based on the 80's original series)
I was inspired to update it.
It was a Saturday in the fall of 1987, just weeks after the premier of Beauty & the Beast. My first impulse, after falling head over heels in love with Vincent and Catherine, was to find out more about the original fairytale. I headed to the public library, where I found nothing at all in the main adult library. I decided to try the separate children’s library next door. As I walked in, I felt more than a little foolish because I obviously hadn’t been inside that building in ages.
But I had to know more. I knew almost nothing about Beauty & the Beast at that point. I
grew up with many fairytales: the Disney versions of Snow White, Cinderella, Sleeping
Beauty, and others. I had even seen a version of Hans Christian Andersen’s The Little Mermaid with its horribly sad
ending. But my only childhood memory of Beauty & the Beast was being shown a
quick slide show presentation of the story one day in grammar school.
The book I found that day in the children’s library was
nothing special. The illustrations were
very gloomy and vague – not at all like you would expect to find in a good
children’s book. After reading through
it, I noticed that the last page of the book had a brief summary of the story’s
origins. This was before the ubiquitous phrase,
“a tale as old as time,” and I was fascinated to learn that this show that had
me so mesmerized was, in fact, nothing that new, but a story that has had many,
many incarnations over the centuries. You could say that from that moment on, the
history of Beauty & the Beast became
a passion of mine – every bit as much as the CBS series.
While the Beauty
& the Beast story had a long history before Vincent and Catherine, they
were still a most unique interpretation for many reasons. We know that they had a major impact on us as
fans, but I’ve had suspicions for years now that they also had a major impact
on the medium of television. I’d like to
suggest that our Vincent and Catherine forever altered the concept of Beauty & the Beast and television
romance in general.
Since our show ended, there have been a myriad of
other stories that were Beauty & the
Beast-like. These are love stories that are special or unique in the same
way that Vincent and Catherine were.
These couples have a special soulful connection - with each other - and
with the viewers. I guess it’s possible
that such a category of romance could have existed before 1987, but I never
noticed it. And back then, I was a lot
less discriminating in the television that I watched. Now, keep in mind, these characters and the
shows they belong to may look nothing like our Beauty & the Beast on the outside, but we fans should know not
to judge by appearances.
It helps to first think about the following
question: Why is the Beauty & the
Beast story so popular and enduring?
(continued...)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

